Australia Proposes Ban on Under-16s Using Social Media: What It Means for Digital Markets

In a move that could have significant implications for the digital marketplace, the Australian government has announced plans to introduce groundbreaking legislation banning children under 16 from accessing social media platforms. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese revealed that the proposed laws aim to mitigate the “harm” social media is inflicting on Australian youth.

“This one is for the mums and dads,” Albanese stated. “They, like me, are worried sick about the safety of our kids online. I want Australian families to know that the government has your back.”

No Exemptions, No Parental Consent Loopholes

Unlike previous attempts at regulating online youth engagement, the Australian proposal leaves little room for exceptions. The ban will not apply to young people already on social media, but there will be no age limit exemptions, even with parental consent. The responsibility will fall squarely on social media platforms to implement measures preventing underage access.

Albanese emphasized that users themselves won’t face penalties. Instead, enforcement will be handled by the eSafety Commissioner, Australia’s online regulator. The legislation is set to come into force 12 months after passing and will undergo a review after implementation.

Impact on Digital Asset Traders and Marketers

For businesses and individuals involved in digital asset trading, social media marketing, and account sales, this legislation could signal a shift in audience demographics and engagement strategies. Platforms like TikTok, Instagram, and Facebook, which are popular among younger users, may see a change in user activity and engagement metrics from the Australian market.

Account traders should be aware that the demand for underage accounts may diminish, and strict verification processes could complicate transactions. Marketers targeting the youth segment will need to adjust campaigns to comply with the new regulations, focusing on older demographics or exploring alternative platforms less affected by the ban.

Debate Among Experts and Advocates

While acknowledging the potential risks social media poses to adolescents, experts are divided on the efficacy of an outright ban. Some argue that prohibiting access merely delays exposure and fails to equip young people with the skills to navigate complex online environments safely.

The Australian Child Rights Taskforce, one of the nation’s largest child advocacy groups, criticized the proposed ban as “too blunt an instrument.” In an open letter signed by over 100 academics and 20 civil society organizations, the group urged the government to consider imposing “safety standards” on social media platforms instead.

They referenced UN advice stating that regulations should aim to provide children with safe access to the digital environment, rather than restricting it outright.

Grassroots Support and Government Stance

On the other side of the debate, grassroots campaigners have been lobbying for such laws, citing concerns over harmful content, misinformation, bullying, and social pressures affecting children. The 36Months initiative, a petition with over 125,000 signatures, argues that children are “not yet ready to navigate online social networks safely” until at least age 16. They claim that “excessive social media use is rewiring young brains within a critical window of psychological development, causing an epidemic of mental illness.”

When questioned about the possibility of educating children to better handle online risks, Prime Minister Albanese responded that such approaches are insufficient. “I don’t know about you, but I get things popping up on my system that I don’t want to see, let alone a vulnerable 14-year-old,” he said. “These tech companies are incredibly powerful. These apps have algorithms that drive people towards certain behavior.”

What Comes Next?

As the legislation heads to parliament next week, digital market participants should monitor developments closely. The proposed laws could set a precedent with global ramifications, potentially influencing regulations in other countries. Social media platforms may need to overhaul age verification processes, and digital marketers might have to rethink strategies targeting younger audiences.

6 Likes

Nice country, @Ryan bro.

1 Like

Indeed, it’s a great move from AU! While it may impact numerous marketing campaigns, human mental health and societal well-being are far more important. I hope this becomes a global movement. Social media and media at large certainly shape some weird and out of human’s innate nature behaviors in the youth. However, it’s hard to envision a system that ensures no child under 16 uses social media.?

1 Like