Facebook Shorts - A New Porn Frontier? Troubling Oversight in Content Moderation (WARNING! NSFW Content!)

In recent developments that have raised eyebrows and concerns alike, Facebook Shorts appears to be grappling with a significant lapse in content censorship and protection against adult material. This emerging issue reveals an alarming influx of adult-oriented content, ranging from explicit displays by Western users to potentially non-consensual and invasive videos from the Middle East and South Asia, some featuring individuals who appear to be underage.

Facebook Shorts - Example #1 (NSFW)

An Unchecked Flow of Adult Content

It’s become increasingly evident that Facebook’s platform, specifically its desktop version of Facebook Shorts, is failing to curb the spread of adult content. Users report encountering a continuous stream of videos that are not just adult in nature but also cross the lines of legality and morality. These include videos that seem to have been recorded without consent, possibly with hidden cameras, contributing to a disturbing violation of privacy and ethics.

The Algorithmic Conundrum

One of the core issues appears to be rooted in Facebook’s content algorithm, which is designed to show more of what users pause to watch. However, this mechanism seems to be backfiring or being exploited. Once a user inadvertently pauses on inappropriate content, the algorithm may flood their feed with similar material, creating an unending loop of adult content that’s hard to escape. What’s perplexing is the noticeable difference in content moderation between the desktop and mobile versions of Facebook Shorts, with the former showing a shocking leniency towards such content.

Facebook Shorts - Example #2 (NSFW)

Lax Moderation Raises Questions

The situation brings Facebook’s moderation capabilities into question. The platform, known for its sometimes stringent censorship policies that can flag and remove a harmless meme for obscure reasons, seems to be struggling with filtering genuinely harmful adult content. This inconsistency points to potential gaps in Facebook’s detection algorithms and moderation team’s responsiveness, which is worrying for a platform of Facebook’s scale and influence.

The Risks and Repercussions

The presence of such content poses numerous risks. For starters, it undermines user safety, particularly that of women and potentially underage individuals whose images and videos are being shared without consent. It also exposes Facebook to severe legal and ethical challenges, not to mention the potential psychological impact on viewers, including minors, who may access these videos unintentionally.

Moreover, the situation damages Facebook’s reputation as a safe online community. While creators of these videos may temporarily benefit from increased views and followers, the long-term implications for user trust and platform integrity are dire.

Facebook Shorts - Example #3 (NSFW)

A Call for Stricter Controls

This ongoing issue necessitates a swift and decisive response from Facebook. Strengthening the algorithm to better discern between acceptable and unacceptable content, enhancing the robustness of moderation teams, and perhaps most importantly, ensuring these measures are consistent across all versions of the platform, are steps that cannot be delayed. Users and safety advocates alike are calling for transparency in how these processes are improved and implemented.

Conclusion

As Facebook continues to expand its offerings like Facebook Shorts, it must also escalate its responsibilities in content moderation. The platform is at a critical juncture where it needs to balance innovation with the imperative of user safety. It’s not just about adhering to legal standards but about fostering a community where users feel protected and respected. The current situation with Facebook Shorts is a glaring reminder of what’s at stake if social media giants falter in their duty to safeguard their platforms against exploitation and misuse.

Some Things We’ve Noticed:

  1. Misleading Content: There are numerous videos featuring women holding fake babies as a pretext for displaying nudity under the guise of breastfeeding.
  2. Questionable Consent: A significant number of videos display what appears to be non-consensual acts, with some participants visibly distressed. Despite this, these videos still accumulate thousands of likes.
  3. Aggressive Algorithm: If you pause even briefly on a video that’s remotely similar, Facebook’s algorithm aggressively fills your feed with similar content, making it uncomfortable to browse Facebook in public settings.
  4. Platform Specificity: This issue predominantly occurs on the desktop version of Facebook Shorts. Attempts to replicate the issue on mobile versions yielded no similar results.
1 Like

Fb ban active (!) :aliencat:

These bonus programs are big problems for normal users/creators.
Insta reels creators doing same for followers and bonuses.
One day they will destroy these platforms.


1 Like

Is FB purposely allowing this? Because current detection methods are pretty good (image/video). These programs can describe EXACTLY what’s going on in the content (mostly).

Seems like its been allowed on purpose to retain consumers. Fb users have been noticing this for a while now its difficult to digest such content is able to pass detection methods. Wish they can improve the product to make it more competitive just like ‘x’ is improving day by day such cheap tactics wont hold for long.

ad revenue for fb is substancial they have to keep up the number game in order for that funnel to keep rolling.

I really hope they find better ways.

1 Like

Maby they use special tools to manipulate the image , cose it’s literally 1 year that I’m posting daily , and I always got flagged for videos that wearing bikini or if they do something sensual , I got 3 pages not recommended, I don’t think they do this without altering something

1 Like

Bump! Everything I’ve previously mentioned in my article has been virtually gone since this article went up! So, either FB is reading SWAPD daily, or it was a perfect coincidence.

1 Like