Meta Sues Alleged Instagram Extortionist Who Boasted About His Account Hostage Scam on a Podcast

Meta has taken legal action against an alleged scammer accused of running a large-scale extortion racket, banning and unbanning Instagram accounts for a hefty price. The lawsuit, filed this week, targets Idriss Qibaa, the operator behind the notorious “Unlocked 4 Life” scheme, which was previously detailed in a criminal complaint filed by prosecutors.

Qibaa openly admitted to his illicit activities during an appearance on Adam22’s No Jumper podcast in January 2024. Calling himself a “professional when it comes to banning and unbanning Instagram accounts,” he claimed to have over 200 clients paying him monthly to keep their accounts secure. He even bragged about raking in over $600,000 per month through this operation. During the interview, Adam22 noted that high-profile individuals have been victims of similar schemes, to which Qibaa casually responded that they were “getting extorted.”

Scammer Allegedly Earned $600,000 Monthly By Holding Instagram Accounts Hostage

The indictment against Qibaa, issued by a federal grand jury in Nevada in August 2024, alleges that his operations went far beyond just social media manipulation. According to court documents, his tactics included threats of violence, harassment, and intimidation. Victims who refused to comply reportedly received hundreds—if not thousands—of threatening messages, racial slurs, and even images of beaten individuals as warnings. In one particularly disturbing instance, Qibaa allegedly threatened to release a victim’s Social Security number unless she paid him $20,000.

Meta responded to the allegations with a strong statement: “We will consider all enforcement and legal options to protect people on our platforms. These particular abuses target users and violate our policies, and we are committed to countering these malicious activities.”

The Full Scope of the Alleged Scheme

Meta’s lawsuit accuses Qibaa of offering a range of unauthorized services, including:

  • The ability to disable Instagram accounts at will
  • Illicit reinstatement of accounts previously banned for violating Meta’s policies
  • Fake engagement services to artificially inflate follower counts

Moreover, Meta claims that Qibaa wasn’t limiting his extortion racket to Instagram alone. According to the complaint, he ran similar operations on X (formerly Twitter), YouTube, TikTok, Snapchat, and Telegram.

Meta initially tried to shut Qibaa down in February 2024 by sending him a cease-and-desist letter, revoking his access to Facebook and Instagram, and disabling his accounts. However, the lawsuit alleges that he simply created new accounts to evade these restrictions and continued business as usual.

What This Means for the Underground Account Market

For those involved in the buying, selling, or recovering of accounts, this case sets a major precedent. Platforms like Instagram and others are cracking down harder than ever on unauthorized services. SWAPD members should be especially wary of anyone claiming they can “guarantee” account recoveries or bans for a fee—Meta is watching, and lawsuits like this show they are willing to go after individuals who manipulate their systems.

If you have any insights into similar schemes or know of other cases of social media extortion, feel free to discuss them on SWAPD’s forums—while keeping within the platform’s rules, of course.

9 Likes

There is another lawsuit @GOAT mentioned about (Daniel Folger).

Meta sued photographer and entrepreneur Daniel Folger in the California Northern District Court on Tuesday. The photographer allegedly sold Instagram handles at prices ranging from $700 to $50,000.

Meta says Folger has been offering and selling Instagram usernames since 2022 and continued those activities until this month.

1 Like

Does that mean it’s cheaper for them to sue than to “fix” their system?

1 Like

Yeah, be careful those offering especially ban services here on Swapd. Everyone here is ID-verified, and one notice from the authorities is all it takes for the Swapd staff to hand over your details and rat you out. Next thing you know, two guys in uniforms might be knocking at your door.

1 Like

It’s not about fixing their system or anything like that. You might rely on proper methods, but those guys rely on rogue reps. They fire reps all the time without consequences — but in rare, high-profile cases like this, they make an exception. Keep in mind, this is just 2 incidents over the span of a couple of years. Plus, it’s good PR for them to act like they’re “fighting” the issue, even though they can never fully get rid of all the insiders.

3 Likes

with due respect to everyone, but my opinion is that no one has a “tail” working in Facebook, all “unbans” are either methods or panels or official GOV emails. Whoever claims to know the person SITTING IN THE OFFICE (in my opinion is a lie) because that person risks several years in prison, dismissal, and as far as I know EVERYONE’s phones are monitored.

Maybe I’m wrong and maybe that 0.00000001% managed to reach that person, but the chance is small.

I have a better chance in my head and the possibility of getting a job on Facebook myself than by finding someone just like that.

2 Likes

Negative. Polish data protection act forbids any foreign entities for obtaining your data, unless they go through the NATIONAL prosecutors office. Source: Been through this before. We’ve literally refused handing over data to police authorities of other countries and they couldn’t do anything about it. Not because we wanted to act tough, because we would get in legal trouble if we did. Throughout our 8 years of existence, only one country went through the entire court process, and it took a year of bickering and lawyers. However, the user who was sought after did a very very bad thing. Cannot discuss it, so don’t ask.

9 Likes

They also did business on META, also flexing everywhere. Also, anyone who bans someone’s account just to extort money to get it back, deserves to be canned.

4 Likes

That’s completely false. Don’t spread information you’re unsure of.

IMP unbans are methods.
Instant unbans and verifications — with rep.
PR verification through portal.
Name changes via portal.

Copyright cases; often rep’s who are leaving, unbanning a shitload of accounts because they don’t care.

1 Like

One more thing, all this is only dor USA, CANADA, AUSTRALIA etc but if you are third world country, don’t worry we have NO LAWS FOR ANYTHING

1 Like

Yes. They ran illegal business activities, promoting even more illegal business — all on a platform where they were already breaking the rules. It’s so unbelievably stupid, it’s hard to put into words.

I had Canada’s highest court rule against me (Canada sued me) for not giving up the data, citing “you will get arrested if in Canada” yada yada yada. They tried to bully our police so they bully me. I remember the Polish police calling me asking “will you give up the data?” and I asked “do I have to?”, they said no. I asked, “will I get in trouble if I do?”. They said “possibly.”

THEN WHY ARE YOU CALLING ME!!!

2 Likes

That’s how shitty the world justice system is.

  1. Canada didn’t feel like doing a proper filing for the data
  2. They decided to scare me for a year
  3. They sued
  4. I lost (shocker, I wasn’t even there)
  5. Once they saw it didn’t work, they called the authorities in Poland
  6. Noob cops in Poland didn’t feel like handling this crap, so they tried to persuade me IN A WAY where I would be in trouble.
3 Likes

I know people who offered ig serices throughout Partner escalations that got cease and dessist letters from Meta just because they talked about these cases throughout whatsapp let alone posting into Instagram stories or bragging about these on the socials.

1 Like

So selling these services can led you to jail?

I dont think there is any law stating bans/unbans are illegal yet. When you’re adding in threats & extortion it’s a different story.

@SWAPD you mentioned in Poland users IDs couldn’t be obtained by authorities, with your move to Canada, would you be obliged to hand over personal information & data if requested by law enforcement?

Just a genuine question, no one should be doing anything illegal anyway.

1 Like

@SWAPD how the ■■■■ did they get your name?

first time on the internet?

1 Like

This is it. @onlyfans is right. This goes beyond business. That’s why he is getting sued.

Same goes for the case @goat mentioned. He got sued because he hacked 6 figures worth of usernames.

Otherwise we never hear normal day to day social media business of our “uncommon services” be in the spotlight.